You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

betterthanwell comments on [Link] New paper: "The quantum state cannot be interpreted statistically" - Less Wrong Discussion

9 Post author: p4wnc6 18 November 2011 06:13PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (27)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: betterthanwell 18 November 2011 07:43:09PM *  5 points [-]

Earlier, on Less Wrong: Quantum Non-Realism

The best you could theoretically do would not include saying anything like, "The wavefunction only gives us probabilities, not certainties." That, in retrospect, was jumping to a conclusion; the wavefunction gives us a certainty of many worlds existing. So that part about the wavefunction being only a probability, was not-quite-right. You calculated, but failed to shut up.


I have the highest respect for any historical physicists who even came close to actually shutting up and calculating, who were genuinely conservative in assessing what they did and didn't know. (...) My scorn is reserved for those who interpreted "We don't know why it works" as the positive knowledge that the equations were definitely not real.