You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

thomblake comments on Probability puzzle - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: malthrin 28 November 2011 09:33PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (26)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: thomblake 29 November 2011 12:48:44AM 1 point [-]

So then can N be the dynamic result of a function, rather than a value?

Comment author: malthrin 29 November 2011 12:52:59AM 0 points [-]

No, you have to state N before you start flipping coins.

Comment author: thomblake 29 November 2011 01:11:31AM 1 point [-]

Ah, I get it now. N is stated ahead of time, but you can (predictably) use the information so far to "stop playing" whenever you want, and that's part of the optimal strategy to consider in the expectation.

Comment author: Matt_Simpson 29 November 2011 01:15:19AM *  0 points [-]

Yeah, which means if I'm trying to maximize my payout, I'll set N arbitrarily large and abort the game at sufficient evidence that the coin isn't predictable enough for the game to have positive expected value. If the coin is predictable enough, then I'll pump my friend for every last cent he has.

However, note that the problem as stated asks for the minimum value of N so that the game has positive expected value. (I'm not too sure why we're interested in this except as an exercise).

edit: just clarifying for others. Not that I think you misunderstood.