You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Nisan comments on Several Topics that May or May Not deserve their own Post - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: EphemeralNight 29 November 2011 01:59AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (69)

Comments (69)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Nisan 29 November 2011 04:44:34AM *  7 points [-]

Sometimes with small children, I get the impression they're asking "why?" for the social interaction rather than to actually get answers.

The story I tell myself about this is that at some point every child learns that there is a magic word, "why", that always keeps a conversation going. I will test this hypothesis the next time a kid does this to me by responding with nonsense.

"Why?"

"Because zebra donkey tomatillos."

"Why?"

"See, you're not even listening."

"Why?"

Comment author: bradm 29 November 2011 02:56:58PM *  7 points [-]

This reminds me of Louis CK's bit about kids asking "why?"

Louis C. K.: Because some things are and some things are not!

Daughter: Why?

Louis: Because things that are not can't be!

Daughter: Why?

Louis: Because then nothing wouldn't be! You can't have nothing isn't! Everything is!

Daughter: Why?

Louis: Because if nothing wasn't, there would be all kinds of shit that we don't like. Giant ants with top hats dancing around. There isn't room for that shit!

Comment author: gwern 29 November 2011 09:06:27PM 3 points [-]

...You know, that dialogue is disturbingly like ancient and Pre-socratic discussions of Parmenides.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 29 November 2011 07:22:35AM *  8 points [-]

"Because zebra donkey tomatillos."

I predict the answer is:

"No, that's silly!"

(I've tried something similar to this with a friend's kid.)

Comment author: JoshuaZ 29 November 2011 07:11:11PM 3 points [-]

I suspect that they'd be much more likely to notice if the sentence doesn't make grammatical sense. In the grammatical but nonsensical versions they might be listening and even then just lack the ability to understand fully if they've been given a good explanation. In some cases "why" might even be shorthand for not understanding the previous explanation.

Comment author: David_Gerard 29 November 2011 01:26:00PM *  1 point [-]

You appear to have an audio bug in my house.

Comment author: TimS 29 November 2011 04:57:41AM 0 points [-]

Just because I'm curious, what probability would you assign to your hypothesis being correct?

Comment author: Nisan 29 November 2011 05:05:04AM *  1 point [-]

50%. And I'd only do it when I'm irritated. The irritation means they don't care about the answer.

EDIT: Sorry, I mean 50% probability that they won't notice I'm talking nonsense. I don't want to assign a probability to the underlying hypothesis.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit