I'm not sure if it is "worth saying" but a google search for "Secret Bayesian Man" turned up nothing so I wrote this:
ET Jaynes was a 1000 year old vampire
Inspired Cog Sci, AI and Eliezer.
The Probabilities,
Is something that we'll see.
Given that we have the same priors.
Secret Bayesian Man,
Secret Bayesian Man,
You update your beliefs,
Based on the evidence. (2x)
A grandmaster of Bayesian Statistics
He'll straighten out your bias and Heuristics
You'll be Less Wrong than most
You'll take a "Rational Approach..."
Given that we have the same priors
Secret Bayesian Man
Secret Bayesian Man
You update your beliefs,
Based on the evidence. (2x)
Aumann states we must come to agreement
If we have common knowledge with no secrets
Our posteriors must be the same
Or one of us is to blame
Given that we have the same priors.
I deeply apologize.
You'll take a "Rational Approach..."
That was a nice touch.
If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.
If continuing the discussion becomes impractical, that means you win at open threads; a celebratory top-level post on the topic is traditional.