= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Manfred comments on Probability puzzle: Coins in envelopes - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (18)
Oh, whoops, I didn't read the question correctly. Drat, then it's not Laplace's rule of succession.
In fact, that messes up pretty much everything - I've finally found a use for the retract button.
Well, not everything - it isn't Laplace's rule of succession, but if you correct the mistake, you've pretty much solved part 2. Instead of a fixed value you get an equation you can solve for m.
That's true. It also invalidates my answer for part 1, which is a bit trickier to correct, because you no longer have the nice symmetry.