I do find myself at 10, and N, and N+1.
That is, I exist in each timeslice, and in each one I have an experience that encompasses that timeslice and no others. (Including the data structures existing in that timeslice that record events in other timeslices.)
Is that not your experience as well?
The only way I can make sense of the question is to rephrase it as something like "Why do I only experience one timeslice at a time? Why don't I experience both N+1 and N simultaneously?" But I'm not sure if that's what you're asking.
Related to: lesswrong.com/lw/qp/timeless_physics/
Why do I find myself at this point in
time, configuration space, rather than another point? In other words, why do I have certain expectations rather than others?I don't expect the U.S. presidential elections to have happened but to happen next, where "to happen" and "to have happened" internally marks the sequential order of steps indexed by consecutive timestamps. But why do I find myself to have that particular expectation rather than any other, what is it that does privilege this point?
My question is why I find myself to remember that the particle went left and then right rather than left but not yet right?
Yes, but why does my version experience this point of my branch and not any other point of my branch?
I understand that if this universe was a giant simulation and that if it was to halt and then resume, after some indexical measure of causal steps used by those outside of it, then I wouldn't notice it. Therefore if you remove the notion of an outside world there ceases to be any measure of how many causal steps it took until I continued my relational measure of progression.
But that's not my question. Assume for a moment that my consciousness experience is not a causal continuum but a discrete sequence of causal steps from 1, 2, 3, ... to N where N marks this point. Why do I find myself at N rather than 10 or N+1?