You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

torekp comments on [Link] Belief in religion considered harmful? - Less Wrong Discussion

24 [deleted] 17 December 2011 10:38PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (54)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: torekp 18 December 2011 06:19:08PM 2 points [-]

You're too kind by far. A category which is cognitively economical but classes a few non-dangerous items into a largely dangerous category, or vice versa, can still be extremely useful. So a criticism which points to such an instance (Marxism) is weak. But a criticism which invents such an instance (Nazism a la Thor) is beyond weak. Categories prove their usefulness is the real world.

The problem is - to paraphrase pragmatist's summary of the Hanson-Moldbug debate - Moldbug is thinking like a(n old-school analytic) philosopher. We need to think like social scientists on this one.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 19 December 2011 06:12:12PM -1 points [-]

This seems reasonable on its face except for the implicit claim that Marxism isn't dangerous. The history of the 20th century seems to indicate otherwise.

Comment author: torekp 20 December 2011 03:01:42AM 1 point [-]

Huh? Did you miss the "or vice versa"?

Comment author: JoshuaZ 20 December 2011 03:03:46AM 2 points [-]

Hmm. I think I did. Sorry about that.