You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Solvent comments on If You Were Brilliant When You Were Ten... - Less Wrong Discussion

24 Post author: AspiringKnitter 27 December 2011 02:33AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (68)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Solvent 31 December 2011 11:38:44AM 0 points [-]

My solution was to grade myself on process instead of achievement: I defined success not as "learning two new songs" but as "practicing guitar for half an hour every week."

I would have thought that would be quite a bad idea, as it rewards you for attempting to do something, as opposed to succeeding. Kaj talked about this here.

Comment author: wedrifid 31 December 2011 12:13:56PM *  2 points [-]

I would have thought that would be quite a bad idea, as it rewards you for attempting to do something, as opposed to succeeding.

When done well (in particular with a focusing the practice on specific techniques) this is actually the right approach. You then transition to success focus once you get to a fairly high standard. Science says so, with randomised, controlled studies. (Source, Cambridge Handbook of Expertise etc., via memory.)

Comment author: Solvent 31 December 2011 12:41:13PM 0 points [-]

Okay. I suspect that the focus on particular techniques is the main reason that you're right. Thanks for pointing this out.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 31 December 2011 05:27:45PM 0 points [-]

What do you consider practice to be an unsuccessful attempt to do, exactly?

Comment author: MugaSofer 15 December 2012 09:44:57PM -1 points [-]

Learn, I assume.