= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
JonathanLivengood comments on Philosophy that can be "taken seriously by computer scientists" - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (15)
In your linked piece, you were talking about formal epistemology. Here you say "formal philosophy." Is that a typo, or do you think that formal epistemology exhausts formal philosophy? (I would hope not the latter, since lots of formal work gets done in philosophy outside epistemology!)
Formal epistemology is a subfield within formal philosophy, probably the largest.
Larger than logic? Hmm ... maybe you're thinking about "formal philosophy" in a way that I am unfamiliar with.