You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Will_Newsome comments on Stupid Questions Open Thread - Less Wrong Discussion

42 Post author: Costanza 29 December 2011 11:23PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (265)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Will_Newsome 30 December 2011 03:50:54AM 0 points [-]

Consciousness isn't the point. A machine need not be conscious, or "alive", or "sentient," or have "real understanding" to destroy the world.

(I see what you mean, but technically speaking your second sentence is somewhat contentious and I don't think it's necessary for your point to go through. Sorry for nitpicking.)

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 30 December 2011 04:31:54PM 2 points [-]

(Slepnev's "narrow AI argument" seems to be related. A "narrow AI" that can win world-optimization would arguably lack person-like properties, at least on the stage where it's still a "narrow AI".)