This seems to depend on the implicit assumption that their donors (and everyone else powerful enough to make their lives difficult) don't mind having the values of third parties respected.
If some do mind, then there's probably some optimally pragmatic balancing point short of all humans.
Probably, but defining that balancing point would mean a lot of bureaucratic overhead to determine who to exclude or include.
This is for anyone in the LessWrong community who has made at least some effort to read the sequences and follow along, but is still confused on some point, and is perhaps feeling a bit embarrassed. Here, newbies and not-so-newbies are free to ask very basic but still relevant questions with the understanding that the answers are probably somewhere in the sequences. Similarly, LessWrong tends to presume a rather high threshold for understanding science and technology. Relevant questions in those areas are welcome as well. Anyone who chooses to respond should respectfully guide the questioner to a helpful resource, and questioners should be appropriately grateful. Good faith should be presumed on both sides, unless and until it is shown to be absent. If a questioner is not sure whether a question is relevant, ask it, and also ask if it's relevant.