I was wondering, why aren't don't articles that are part of a sequence tagged as such?
For example: fun theory sequence
I often get linked to one of the older articles and then have to do a search first to figure out which sequence it is a part of and then to find the other parts of the sequence.
If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.
If continuing the discussion becomes impractical, that means you win at open threads; a celebratory top-level post on the topic is traditional.
Poster's Note: omg, it felt so weird typing "2012" up there.