You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

jimrandomh comments on AI Challenge: Ants - Post Mortem - Less Wrong Discussion

11 Post author: D_Alex 12 January 2012 07:23AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (21)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: jimrandomh 14 January 2012 10:16:01PM 8 points [-]

The problem with programming challenges is that if you win a programming challenge, you probably could've spent the same time doing a very similar thing but produced something of much greater value (money, software that people will actually use, research that will actually be built on). The unfortunate consequence of this is that you aren't likely to see many rationalists entering these competitions without strong motivation, and a little prestige and publicity isn't enough.

Also, building a functioning team of programmers out of loosely-committed geographically-dispersed acquaintances is ridiculously hard, and if you could do it, you wouldn't waste that power on a game.

Comment author: D_Alex 16 January 2012 07:53:16AM 3 points [-]

you probably could've spent the same time doing a very similar thing but produced something of much greater value (money, software that people will actually use

What, specifically, would you suggest?

research that will actually be built on

This is one desired outcome of these AI challenges.

building a functioning team of programmers out of loosely-committed geographically-dispersed acquaintances is ridiculously hard, and if you could do it, you wouldn't waste that power on a game.

No, this is completely arse-about. The "game" should be used as a medium to develop cooperation skills.