You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

malthrin comments on Procedural knowledge gap: public key encryption - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Solvent 12 January 2012 07:35AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (18)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: malthrin 12 January 2012 10:15:49PM 1 point [-]

Right. Encryption is a lever; it permits you to use the secrecy of a small piece of data (the key) to secure a larger piece of data (the message). The security isn't in the encryption math. It's in the key storage and exchange mechanism.

*I stole this analogy from something I read recently, probably on HN.