You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

srdiamond comments on Q&A with experts on risks from AI #3 - Less Wrong Discussion

13 Post author: XiXiDu 12 January 2012 10:45AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (28)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 15 January 2012 10:16:45PM 0 points [-]

I don't understand the reasoning the APA used to justify getting rid of the psychopathy diagnosis. It seems to be quite a distinct subgroup within ASPD.

If that were the case, the solution would be easy: recognize psychopathy as a subgroup. They could call it Antisocial Personality Disorder, malignant variety, perhaps.

But the classic Cleckley psychopath often isn't an anti-social personality. Antisocial personality is based on concrete diagnostic criteria that high-functioning, intelligent psychopaths don't necessarily manifest; they may be political leaders, attorneys, judges, businessmen, anywhere arbitrary power can be found. I think they are probably better conceived as a subset of Narcissistic Personality Disorder. But the psychiatrists who pioneered in applying that diagnosis, the psychoanalyst Kohut and colleagues, have a more romantic understanding of their narcissistic patients. Politics figure large in the diagnostic manual's catalog.