You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

asr comments on Ethics of piracy - Less Wrong Discussion

-10 [deleted] 18 January 2012 01:55AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (43)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: asr 18 January 2012 04:50:28AM *  4 points [-]

Adobe doesn't think that its marginal cost of producing another copy of the software is low.

Just a terminology note. Adobe might wish that customers conflate marginal and average costs, but there's no reason for us to play along. Their average costs are indeed substantial. The marginal cost for a copy is the difference between the cost to make n copies and n+1 -- which is negligible for software.

Comment author: TimS 18 January 2012 05:14:18PM 1 point [-]

If Adobe believed that the market would not respect the use of average cost rather than marginal cost, it wouldn't make the software because it could not reasonably anticipate recovering its costs and making a profit.

I'm not saying that Adobe has a "right" to make a profit. I'm saying that there are consequences to the position "Adobe has no right to make a profit."

Comment author: asr 18 January 2012 06:13:59PM 3 points [-]

Yes. I agree with you entirely about prices and profits.

My only reason for commenting is that I wanted to clarify the meaning of the terms "average cost" and "marginal cost". The former includes amortized costs, the latter doesn't.