You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

katydee comments on The Singularity Institute's Arrogance Problem - Less Wrong Discussion

63 Post author: lukeprog 18 January 2012 10:30PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (307)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 20 January 2012 10:06:09PM 2 points [-]

(So You Want To Be A Seed AI Programmer)

I hadn't seen that before. Was it written before the sequences?

I ask because it all seemed trivial to my sequenced self and it seemed like it was not supposed to be trivial.

I must say that writing the sequences is starting to look like it was a very good idea.

Comment author: katydee 21 January 2012 04:32:53PM 1 point [-]

I believe so; I also believe that post is now considered obsolete.