You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

RobertLumley comments on What's going on here? - Less Wrong Discussion

15 Post author: RobertLumley 27 January 2012 01:38AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (61)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RobertLumley 27 January 2012 02:38:40AM 5 points [-]

The former is my guess at this point, given that I've gotten over 100 upvotes since I posted this (thanks guys). And I looked at the only one who responded to my karmassassination comment, and it looks a lot like a dummy account:

http://lesswrong.com/user/CallMeSIR/

Comment author: J_Taylor 27 January 2012 03:32:17AM *  7 points [-]

This comment does not seem to warrant its current number of upvotes:

http://lesswrong.com/lw/8s6/video_qa_with_singularity_institute_executive/5g9o

Edit: For posterity, when I first observed the comment, it was at +14 karma.

Comment author: APMason 27 January 2012 03:47:19AM 10 points [-]

Ah, I see how it works:

1) Make several accounts. 2) Post comments with those accounts. 3) Use those accounts to upvote your own comments. 4) Once sufficient karma is achieved, downvote others like crazy.

Comment author: RobertLumley 27 January 2012 03:49:44AM 8 points [-]

5) ???? 6) PROFIT!!

Comment author: [deleted] 28 January 2012 05:33:54PM *  2 points [-]

put a dot and two spaces instead of a ) after the numbers to make an ordered list.

1. this is first
2. this is second

shows up like:

  1. this is first
  2. this is second

EDIT: Doesn't look all that impressive, but it is an html numbered list.

Comment author: khafra 27 January 2012 03:54:31PM 2 points [-]

Its sibling also has 14 undeserved upvotes, which seems strong evidence for 14 sockpuppet accounts being either used offensively on RobertLumley for some reason, or tested before bending the conversation more subtly in other threads.

Comment author: RobertLumley 27 January 2012 05:30:03PM 1 point [-]

Yeah, but he also has some legitimate other posts to his name, which weakens that case.

Comment author: Anubhav 27 January 2012 08:49:37AM *  4 points [-]

Did you notice this comment?

Looks like even the good guys maintain sockpuppets.

Edit: Or create them when need arises.

Comment author: RobertLumley 27 January 2012 12:20:30PM 2 points [-]

Yes, I did. I wasn't sure how to feel about it. I'm pretty sure he alone at least gave me 75 karma back.

Comment author: dbaupp 27 January 2012 01:19:37PM 18 points [-]

I would strongly prefer that people didn't make sock puppets at all, ever (even to right a wrong like this).

I don't want LW to become a battleground for bands of rogue internet users, slinging hordes downvotes onto unsuspecting contrarians.

Poetics aside, LW doesn't appear to have a large enough community for sock puppetry to be ignored (as this incident shows). And having the threat of a large karma hit for statements that are even only mildly not the "accepted position" would accelerate evaporative cooling (and make the whole website a less nice place to be).

Comment author: Invisible 28 January 2012 03:29:56AM 5 points [-]

Incorrect. I up-voted no posts.

Comment author: RobertLumley 28 January 2012 03:42:01AM 0 points [-]

What was the point in making this account then?

And shortly after you posted that comment, my karma steadily increased about at the rate it would take someone to upvote every post I'd made. And old posts of mine kept going up and up, progressively further back in my history.