= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Manfred comments on Toward "timeless" continuous-time causal models - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (22)
What's the goal here? To say "yes, it exists, causality does exist for continuous time?" To use it for stuff? Because if it's the latter I think a lot of loss of generality is gonna have to happen, particularly about what all these functions at each point in phase space are.