You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

APMason comments on Does functionalism imply dualism? - Less Wrong Discussion

-1 Post author: Mitchell_Porter 31 January 2012 03:43AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (34)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: APMason 31 January 2012 05:30:17AM 6 points [-]

you still must either explain how certain patterns of neuronal excitations are actually green

But that's just saying that lavalamp has a unique responsibility to solve the hard problem - everyone already knows it needs to be solved, and nobody knows how to do it. It doesn't undermine functionalism in particular. It's an open problem; we could just as well say that you must explain how [your preferred explanation of consciousness] is actually green.

Comment author: Dustin 31 January 2012 05:49:12AM 2 points [-]

Thank you. I've been typing and retyping trying to say that. I just gave up and refreshed and you'd done it already!

I guess I'm a little too tired.

Comment author: APMason 31 January 2012 05:58:53AM 1 point [-]

Upvoted for stroking my ego.