= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
orthonormal comments on Does functionalism imply dualism? - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (34)
I realize that I have great difficulty interacting with you civilly on Less Wrong, so I'll just note that I have read this post, I found nothing to make me reconsider my prior stance, and I trust other people to raise the objections here that I would if I were more level-headed.
I have no problems with you, even when you're grumpy. And sometimes there isn't enough time to be level-headed.
Thanks. I'm sorry for the earlier insults; it bothers me greatly that I got so snide about it.
For whatever reason, I have a bad reaction to things written by you, PJ Eby, Will Newsome, and Clippy, and the smartest thing for me to do is stay off of the relevant threads until I figure out why and what to do about it.