You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Gabriel comments on Looking for information on cryonics - Less Wrong Discussion

15 Post author: Metus 02 February 2012 12:33PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (55)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Gabriel 02 February 2012 08:09:48PM *  7 points [-]

there is no evidence of it ever being done successfully.

There is evidence that cryonics preserves brain structure to some extent, which, coupled with the fact that people are brains, constitutes Bayesian evidence that cryonics suspensions performed up to this point were successful (that is, information-theoretic death didn't happen). What you require as evidence in this case might be a clear-cut demonstration of a cryonics patient getting revived. However, if we already knew how to revive people we wouldn't bother with cryosuspension in the first place. You can't, at this point in time, reasonably expect that kind of evidence, even if cryonics works perfectly.

Freezing things makes water expand and burst the fragile parts of your brain.

Correctly performed cryosuspension involves vitrification instead of freezing.