You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Maelin comments on Elevator pitches/responses for rationality / AI - Less Wrong Discussion

17 Post author: lukeprog 02 February 2012 08:35PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (68)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Larks 15 February 2012 02:03:30PM 4 points [-]

Slipper slopes work in both directions. Each time you don't strike down injustice, it becomes a bit easier to walk by the next time. I'd sooner have Marginal Value > Marginal Cost than Marginal Value < Marginal Cost and a lower Average Value.

Bad impressions work in both directions. When other people come to a community full of self-purported rationalists, and they see someone presenting stupid, low-status, incendary comments and being treated as worthy of respect, it makes LW look stupid, low-status and incendary because of the Representativeness Heuristic.

Obveously there is a continuum between anarchy and banning everything, and both extremes are local minima. The issue is to judge the local gradient

Comment author: Maelin 16 February 2012 12:02:26AM 0 points [-]

Upvoted for valid point. I agree, but I think there is enough of a difference between 'being treated as worthy of respect' and 'not being banned' that we can probably ride in the middle ground comfortably without any significant image damage.

On consideration, though... maybe I'm prejudiced against banning because of the sense of finality of it. I guess it's not hard to make a new account.

I'm still opposed to deleting past comments though, because deleted comments make a mess of the history.