You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Eugine_Nier comments on How can people be actually converted? - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: yttrium 05 February 2012 10:13PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (94)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: J_Taylor 06 February 2012 09:35:41PM 2 points [-]

I have noticed that reddit's r/atheism is rather fond of basic sexist jokes such as:

http://todayilearned.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/how-men-and-women-take-photos.jpg

What sort of evidence would you like?

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 07 February 2012 04:53:30AM 3 points [-]

If your working definition of "sexism" is implying that women may in at least some ways be different from men in ways that reasonably imply inferiority, I disagree with your definition.

Comment author: J_Taylor 07 February 2012 05:30:19AM *  1 point [-]

The antecedent of your conditional is not the case. I do not have a definition of 'sexism' and am fairly confident that such a thing does not exist. That is, I am skeptical that there is a list of necessary or sufficient conditions that will match the folk-term 'sexism.'

However, the particular joke I linked to is the sort of joke that is often labeled 'sexist' by the sorts of people who care about such matters. That is good enough for me. More importantly, the joke is based off of (what seem to me to be) unjustified premises.