You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

fubarobfusco comments on [Poll] Method of Recruitment - Less Wrong Discussion

9 [deleted] 06 February 2012 05:37PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (93)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 06 February 2012 11:00:49PM *  9 points [-]

I personally find calling people "a female" or "a male" (adjectives used as nouns) to come across as somewhat depersonalizing, as if implying that this were the only significant fact about the person. I would say the same goes for these examples:

  • Racial categories: "He is a black" (noun) vs. "he is black" (predicate adjective)
  • Nationalities: "He is a Chinese" vs. "he is Chinese"
  • Sexual orientations: "He is a gay" vs. "he is gay"

The choice of "female" vs. "woman" (and "male" vs. "man") also seems significant to me. "Female" and "male" sound more clinical and biological — the sort of thing one would expect on a lab report or an autopsy — while "woman" and "man" sound more social or casual. As a male, I have testicles; as a man, I am often expected to be interested in football, porno, and books about war.

Comment author: Maelin 07 February 2012 06:48:32AM 3 points [-]

I agree broadly with this. I'd suggest that "if you are a female reader" feels less depersonalising than "if you are a female". It feels to me like it is conveying the relevant criteria without oversimplifying people to just their gender.

Comment author: [deleted] 07 February 2012 08:14:00AM 2 points [-]

Thanks! Updated OP to "female reader".

Comment author: Oscar_Cunningham 07 February 2012 08:38:15AM *  0 points [-]

The use of "females" in the first line might as well be changed too. I'd just change it to "female people", if I were you.

Comment author: [deleted] 07 February 2012 12:26:02PM 4 points [-]

That's even worse IMO. WTH is wrong with women? (Except that it can be taken to exclude children, but I don't think there are many 10-year-olds reading LW anyway.)

Comment author: [deleted] 07 February 2012 08:43:05AM 0 points [-]

fixed!