You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Vladimir_Nesov comments on Brain shrinkage in humans over past ~20 000 years - what did we lose? - Less Wrong Discussion

15 Post author: Dmytry 18 February 2012 10:17PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (107)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 19 February 2012 10:46:02AM *  11 points [-]

The real argument against cannibalism seems to be easy transmission of infection, not held back by species boundary. If this risk is comparatively sufficiently low, I'd say not eating your fellow humans who died anyway when the food is scarce is a failure mode (famine seems to be convincing enough, and probably occurred often in the prehistoric past).

Comment author: [deleted] 05 March 2012 05:48:00PM 0 points [-]

Excarnation of bodies seems to have been common in some paleolithic populations; it's unknown whether cannibalism was involved (ritual flensing or excarnation of dead bodies has precedents in other human cultures that don't habitually practice cannibalism) but it certainly could have been. Mortuary cannibalism is one of the more widespread exceptions -- many cultures have or once had mostly-symbolic forms of it (some forms don't closely resemble modern flesh-eating -- Yanomamo consumption of ground bones and ashes as a funerary gesture, for example), and it may also have emerged as a means of predator regulation -- don't leave around bodies that could attract something big and nasty.