You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Jandila comments on Brain shrinkage in humans over past ~20 000 years - what did we lose? - Less Wrong Discussion

15 Post author: Dmytry 18 February 2012 10:17PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (107)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: [deleted] 05 March 2012 05:08:37PM 0 points [-]

Hmm. If it's been going on for 20,000 years, then we have groups of humans living in something like ancestral conditions who've been isolated that long. The Sentinelese come to mind (~30,000 years of isolation from the rest of humanity). I can't offhand think of any ethical way to check this, though. Some isolated peoples in New Guinea might also qualify, but a surprising number of them are farmers and have been for a long time. Regardless, if you checked the average brain volume of people from this group (who haven't been effected by agriculture, and may not have the technology to make fire, although it's also conceivable that such a thing could be lost and then regained later) you'd possibly have some idea of whether or not lifestyle changes in the last 10,000 years were a primary factor.

Comment author: gwern 05 March 2012 06:32:52PM 1 point [-]

Such groups are also in the most marginal territories, that we haven't pushed them out of, like the !Kung. Any observed shrinkage might be environmental (eg. nutritional) compared to the old skulls we are looking at, from richer and more normal temperate areas.