You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

bryjnar comments on Longevity Insurance - Less Wrong Discussion

20 Post author: canadaduane 20 February 2012 12:30AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (18)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: bryjnar 21 February 2012 01:58:02PM 1 point [-]

In response to the second point, perhaps one could insure, not a number of years of life, but instead some number of QUALYs, perhaps to be had within a certain time-frame.

So then, if you go blind (which I think has a disability weighting of about 0.5), the insurance company would have to cough up the proportion of the money corresponding to the QUALYs you'd lose.

So suppose I'm in a contract for 80 QUALYs up to the age of 80, and the value of the policy is $2 million. Then if I go blind at 35, I've lost (40/2) = 20 QUALYs, which is 1/4 of my policy, and so I'd get $500,000.

Perhaps if there was a prospect of, say, your blindness being reversed, the company might pay out each year you were blind, or something.