= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Stuart_Armstrong comments on Second order logic, in first order set-theory: what gives? - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (19)
Sounds like a cool idea! Though I wouldn't call it a "sequence" :-)