You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

MinibearRex comments on [SEQ RERUN] Reductionism - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: MinibearRex 29 February 2012 01:11AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (21)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MinibearRex 01 March 2012 03:59:12AM 0 points [-]

do you seriously think that one can potentially renormalize quarks to cognitive biases?

Are you saying that such a task would be prohibitively difficult, and presumably not something that is worth the effort, or are you saying that doing this is impossible in principle?

Comment author: shminux 01 March 2012 05:30:35AM 3 points [-]

I don't think the renormalization group flow has anything to do with the topic, honestly.

Comment author: MinibearRex 02 March 2012 05:10:12AM 0 points [-]

It looked to me like the entire original post was about how you couldn't use lower level laws to extrapolate higher level laws. Renormalization is the only way I know of to do this. Additionally, every comment in this direct thread is about renormalization. I think renormalization is the topic.

Comment author: shminux 02 March 2012 08:38:33PM 4 points [-]

Renormalization is a very specific technique, mostly used in HEP, to work around the infinities cropping up into the calculations. It does not let you predict anything about a lower-energy model from the higher-energy one, only to replace "bare" quantities with the renormalized ones.