Does anyone here understand the exact relationship between near/far and system I/II? LessWrongers often seem to talk as if near is system I and far is system II, but Hanson says near is about logic and far is about intuition.
LessWrongers often seem to talk as if near is system I and far is system II
What? I've never seen this. Anyway it's wrong.
If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.