= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
gwern comments on [Link] Better results by changing Bayes’ theorem - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (17)
Why is this interesting?
Erm, its relation as an example to the quote the article starts with?
Any other machine learning algorithm is a potential example for the observation 'naive token-by-token Bayes can be outperformed'.
I see. I didn't know this was the case. I am sorry if this is something really banal, it was new to me. Feel free to downvote it.