You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

fubarobfusco comments on How to use human history as a nutritional prior? - Less Wrong Discussion

8 Post author: CasioTheSane 10 March 2012 12:47AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (49)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 10 March 2012 02:34:18AM 10 points [-]

It also took a while to notice the effects of cigarette smoking.

While tobacco was used by Europeans in some quantity since the early colonization of North America, it was the mass-production of cigarettes in the late 19th century that made heavy smoking a possibility for a large number of people. The first medical work showing a link between smoking and cancer came out in 1912 and 1929.

But smoking didn't get really huge in the U.S. until the mid-20th century, the era of mass media marketing of cigarettes (L.S./M.F.T.!); the British Doctors Study in 1956 was statistically pretty darned conclusive from a Bayesian standpoint, but was famously opposed by R. A. Fisher. Much of the later controversy on the subject of tobacco and cancer was manufactured by the tobacco industry, well after the matter was scientifically settled.

Sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_effects_of_tobacco_smoking
http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/tables/economics/consumption/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Doctors_Study

Comment author: CronoDAS 10 March 2012 06:16:18AM 0 points [-]

Thanks for the update.