You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

fezziwig comments on How would you take over Rome? - Less Wrong Discussion

25 Post author: Yvain 14 March 2012 04:24PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (200)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: fezziwig 14 March 2012 09:08:04PM 4 points [-]

Fun! I'll post a serious answer when I've more time; for now, some off-the-top observations:

  • 1 AD is in the middle of Augustus' reign; the empire is in decent shape financially and is pretty religiously and culturally diverse.
    • So the hardest part of the God gambit is in getting people to pay attention.
  • Roman politics included assassination, at all levels; extended engagement with Roman political life requires some safety measures, no matter how valuable you've made yourself.
  • The German barbarians hadn't yet recovered from their losses in the previous century; provoking another great migration would be very hard.
    • And their religious practices were never well-documented, so boosting off of their existing structures is probably a no-go.
  • Egypt might be more fruitful, I'll have to check.