You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

DanielLC comments on How would you take over Rome? - Less Wrong Discussion

25 Post author: Yvain 14 March 2012 04:24PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (200)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanielLC 14 March 2012 11:17:55PM 2 points [-]

Unfortunately, extreme levels of power are necessary to get things done. If you're afraid of being assassinated, find a way to prevent it without giving up the power.

Comment author: wedrifid 15 March 2012 03:11:34AM 4 points [-]

Unfortunately, extreme levels of power are necessary to get things done. If you're afraid of being assassinated, find a way to prevent it without giving up the power.

Choose a more versatile form of power. Militaristic political control is absolutely necessary if your task is sweeping social change - and even then political climate asserts much more influence over what you must choose to do than your 'power' exerts on the environment. Money is a far more flexible and reliable form of power for the purpose of getting nearly everything you want to get done.