You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Bugmaster comments on How would you take over Rome? - Less Wrong Discussion

25 Post author: Yvain 14 March 2012 04:24PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (200)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Bugmaster 15 March 2012 07:36:37AM 3 points [-]

Wouldn't the AI practically need to be an Oracle in order to predict all the upcoming historical events down to the specific date ? It would need more than intelligence, it would need nigh omniscience as well, IMO.

Comment author: AstraSequi 16 March 2012 01:40:27AM 1 point [-]

Even with current knowledge, we're not really omniscient about what happened in the past. I know the Romans were good record-keepers (I'm not sure how good), but I would be surprised if there weren't at least some errors and omissions in the small details.

If we did have omniscient knowledge, I would suggest that the situation might be most analogous after several years - when you could still make predictions with high accuracy, but never really being sure that something you've done has slightly changed the dates or other details of specific events.