You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Armok_GoB comments on Please advise the Singularity Institute with your domain-specific expertise! - Less Wrong Discussion

18 Post author: lukeprog 15 March 2012 08:13PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (33)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Armok_GoB 15 March 2012 09:14:23PM 2 points [-]

... Well that list sure is calming. No reason to worry or freak out about those experts being needed. Nope.

Comment author: endoself 15 March 2012 10:44:22PM 4 points [-]

What? The only thing even slightly worrying would be nuclear security, bio-security, and disease control, but we know why they want those experts.

Comment author: Armok_GoB 16 March 2012 01:59:31AM 0 points [-]

Other than that there are some parallels to AI boxing, no, I don't know why they need those.

Also, the law and military processes. Computer security can also be seen as threatening even if the use is obvious.

But yea, mostly I were joking.

Comment author: endoself 16 March 2012 05:22:55PM 2 points [-]

Other than that there are some parallels to AI boxing, no, I don't know why they need those.

Oh, sorry for being excessively brief then. SingInst would want to know how likely various form of existential risk are so they know how likely it is that humanity will survive for X years without FAI. There are various trade-offs that would need to be made differently depending on how urgent things are.

Comment author: Armok_GoB 16 March 2012 09:28:53PM 1 point [-]

Oh. I though they meant experts of how to ensure (or break....) it, not of how good it is in general worldwide.

Comment author: endoself 16 March 2012 11:04:04PM 0 points [-]

That's also possible (to ensure; they don't want to break it). I don't think they can do that much for those problems at the present stage. If they barely have time to publish work on the singularity, it probably isn't a good idea to spend marginal effort on trying to change bio-security policy.

Comment author: Kevin 16 March 2012 03:05:01AM -2 points [-]

But yea, mostly I were joking.

Why bother? Humor is worth it sometimes, when it is really funny, but when someone tries to be funny and isn't, it's useless at best, most often confusing, and harmful at worst.

Comment author: Armok_GoB 16 March 2012 01:42:27PM 1 point [-]

Just because YOU didn't find it funny doesn't mean nobody will, and this joke is fairly harmless. It's mainly in saying something that's actually true in a sarcastic way that implies the opposite is being meant, when in fact it isn't.

Comment author: Kevin 17 March 2012 02:21:12AM -1 points [-]

Harmless in the individual case, but snarkiness really degrades communities over time.