You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

timtyler comments on Muehlhauser-Goertzel Dialogue, Part 1 - Less Wrong Discussion

28 Post author: lukeprog 16 March 2012 05:12PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (161)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: timtyler 17 March 2012 03:17:14PM *  1 point [-]

It's kind-of trivial - you can make goal-directed systems pursue any goal you like.

The correct reply is not to argue for impossibility - but implausibility: our machine descendants will probably contine to maximise entropy - like the current biosphere does - and not some negentropic state - like gold atoms or something.

Yes, that leaves things open for a "but there's still a chance: right?" reply. That's OK - after all, there is a small chance.