You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Peterdjones comments on Muehlhauser-Goertzel Dialogue, Part 1 - Less Wrong Discussion

28 Post author: lukeprog 16 March 2012 05:12PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (161)
Tags: rationality singularity

Comments (161)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Peterdjones 23 January 2013 03:47:50PM 0 points [-]

I don't see the circularity. "human" is a subset of "person"; there's no reason an AI that is a "person" will have "human" values.

I dont' see the relevance. Goetzel isn't talking about building non-human persons.

Also, just thinking of the AI as being human-like doesn't actually make it human-like.

If you design an AI on x-like principles, it will probably be X-like, unless something goes wrong.

Comment author: lavalamp 23 January 2013 04:59:39PM 1 point [-]

Ah, I may not have gotten all the context.

If you design an AI on x-like principles, it will probably be X-like, unless something goes wrong.

If "something goes wrong" with high probability, it will probably not be X-like.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit