You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

drethelin comments on Ontologial Reductionism and Invisible Dragons - Less Wrong Discussion

-11 Post author: Balofsky 20 March 2012 02:29AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (80)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: drethelin 22 March 2012 07:45:02PM 1 point [-]

once you have the catgirls and immortality, in what sense does she need the apologetics?

Comment author: wedrifid 22 March 2012 07:57:32PM 7 points [-]

once you have the catgirls and immortality, in what sense does she need the apologetics?

Whatever sense she likes (in addition to whatever sense you were talking about). If the nature of existence (and possibly the machinations of a rival god) are such that anyone who does not spend three hours in the apologetics library will end up not believing in her (and lose the benefits of affiliation) then I'll spend three hours a day in the boring library. If she actually physically requires the presence of the apologetics library in order to sustain her existence then I'll fight to the death to defend it. (The temporary death. Because I'm immortal. With catgirls.)