You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

NancyLebovitz comments on Best shot at immortality? - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: tomme 22 March 2012 10:29AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (85)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 22 March 2012 10:55:49AM 13 points [-]

My guess as to why cryonics is the best method currently available is that it's the best bet for keeping you potentially alive until better methods are developed.

Speaking just for myself, I'm not convinced that any method can give immortality (Murphy happens), but there's a good bit of hope for greatly extended lifespans.

Comment author: BrandonReinhart 23 March 2012 06:52:57AM *  1 point [-]

What we know about cosmic eschatology makes true immortality seem unlikely, but there's plenty of time (as it were) to develop new theories, make new discoveries, or find possible new solutions. See:

Cirkovic "Forecast for the Next Eon: Applied Cosmology and the Long-Term Fate of Intelligent Beings"

Adams "Long-term astrophysical processes"

for an excellent overview of the current best-estimate for how long a human-complexity mind might hope to survive.

Just about everything CIrkovic writes on the subject is really engaging.