You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

James_Miller comments on Best shot at immortality? - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: tomme 22 March 2012 10:29AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (85)
Tags: technology immortality

Comments (85)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: James_Miller 22 March 2012 01:00:52PM *  4 points [-]

It depends on your age. If you are under 30 it's probably staying alive long enough until we reach longevity escape velocity.. If you are over 60 it's probably cryonics.

Edited in response to Vladimir_Nesov's comment.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 22 March 2012 05:25:34PM 16 points [-]

If you are under 30 it's almost certainly staying alive long enough until we reach longevity escape velocity.

Downvoted for the insane "almost certainly".

Comment author: James_Miller 22 March 2012 09:56:55PM 1 point [-]

Good point.

Comment author: drethelin 22 March 2012 04:01:46PM 3 points [-]

This isn't really an answer. It's kind of like telling someone about Moore's law when they ask what the next big advance in processing will be.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit