Heh, I never even considered being a metacontrarian about this. You're probably right. I think I tend to unsympathetically interpret all missing citations. Still, it seems like most on LW would prefer the citation and a good number would notice its absence.
Still, it seems like most on LW would prefer the citation and a good number would notice its absence.
It's true. And I agree that the post in question would be improved with a reference. Link spam is the best thing about most posts!
How to Run a Successful Less Wrong Meetup is a guide that I've been working on, based on lukeprog's instructions, for the last week and a half. As it says in the beginning:
Here's the table of contents:
This is a draft version, so feedback would be most welcome, particularly on things like:
The link above will take you to a Google Docs copy of the document, with the ability to add comments to the draft. Feel free to comment on the guide either as traditional LW comments or by attaching comments to the document itself: both are fine.
EDIT: Here's the most recent version, though without the commenting ability.
EDIT2: The most recent version as of April 11th, with commenting enabled.
EDIT3: First non-draft version; see also this thread.