Please be aware that not everyone wants you to leave. Whether you conform on not, I hope you stay.

This is fantastic and I look forward to more of the same.

EDIT: downvote me back if it helps. I doubt the regulars will defend this post with their upvotes.

FURTHER EDIT: okay, apparently I was wrong. After a reasonable dip, the comment is headed back up, despite my "No, no. Keep fighting." encouragement.

Clearly I was referring to the fan theory that QQ is Voldemort, or the fact that QQ is Voldemort in canon, not the fact that Eliezer said that DD vf Ibyqrzbeg(and if you need to rot13 to know what I'm saying there, kill yourself now).

For what it's worth, I hadn't read the Rowling books when I first read MoR, and finding out who Quirrell was was actually somewhat of a shock. I'm the target audience for this rule, so far as any such exists, and I think it's pretty dumb. I wouldn't just slap it on as a chapter title if I was the editor, but if you're reading this forum thread, certain things are assumed of you.

My list of examples of people saying that (as violations of the rule) was specifically rejected, since none of them (just as Alsadius's post) mentioned [rot13]gung Ryvrmre unq fnvq vg.[/rot13]. You can't decide "rot13 has to be contagious to the information itself" here, and the opposite when denying that the rule is inconsistently enforced.

Everyone who has defended the policy on the grounds that it only means you can't say [what I rot13'd above] should vote his post back up.

EDIT changed tone