That's not how common knowledge works. I was following the fanfic at the time, and I took that revelation as a statement that gur Cvbarre cyndhr guvat jnf vagraqrq nf n pbapyhfvir va-fgbel erirny. It doesn't matter why EY decided to take it back, or even that he did; it clearly wasn't intended at the time he wrote it as a twist to be revealed later, and it was revealed at the time for everyone who was reading it at the time, so why should new readers get a twist we don't get? He made his decision - and the tone IIRC was that he felt that people who didn't figure it out then were stupid - so he should live with it.
why should new readers get a twist we don't get?
Because the author wants to give it to them.
He made his decision ... so he should live with it.
It is commonly held that making friends is easier when you keep judgements about what people should do with their lives and their possessions to a minimum.
The next discussion thread is here.
This is a new thread to discuss Eliezer Yudkowsky’s Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality and anything related to it. This thread is intended for discussing chapter 84. The previous thread has passed 500 comments. Comment in the 14th thread until you read chapter 84.
There is now a site dedicated to the story at hpmor.com, which is now the place to go to find the authors notes and all sorts of other goodies. AdeleneDawner has kept an archive of Author’s Notes. (This goes up to the notes for chapter 76, and is now not updating. The authors notes from chapter 77 onwards are on hpmor.com.)
The first 5 discussion threads are on the main page under the harry_potter tag. Threads 6 and on (including this one) are in the discussion section using its separate tag system. Also: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14.
As a reminder, it’s often useful to start your comment by indicating which chapter you are commenting on.
Spoiler Warning: this thread is full of spoilers. With few exceptions, spoilers for MOR and canon are fair game to post, without warning or rot13. More specifically: