Anything that isn't fun and isn't good doesn't even enter most people's minds, because there's no reason to do it.
Unless you have a really broad definition of 'fun' you're quire wrong here. Sometime people will experiment. Sometimes people will do what they're told not to as a gesture of defiance. Sometimes people will do things that are very harmful to themselves because it is the only way they can strike against forces they are otherwise powerless to resist, like an abusive partner or guardian. Sometimes people mistakenly think they don't have any other options, sometimes those people aren't mistaken.
If you want to talk about the First World, then maybe you're just barely right with your 'most'; I doubt it, but I think we can just dismiss that possible interpretation instead. Because outside the First World you're quite mistaken: many things that are not fun or good enter into the majority of people's minds.
An amoral man doing stuff he finds to be good fun will generally cross the line to evil precisely where he starts doing all the stuff that he enjoys and that isn't common, because if it's enjoyable and morally acceptable, it'll be common already.
Plenty of evil things are quite common. I had a list, but I don't think it actually adds anything to the comment when I all need to say is "emotionally abusive relationship." They're common enough that it's been claimed they're in the majority.
Well, some people confuse Teh Evulz with awesome.
I don't think they're confused at all.
I am some people, and if evil ain't awesome then I'm confused.
It's generally high-risk. A lot of the obvious examples have overvalued rewards. Much of First World society protects people from it. And that's good, because I like having some protection from people who are better at evil things than I am at defending against them.
But there remain opportunities. And there remains awesome.
Okay, I was oversimplifying - there's "necessary"(which is a pretty broad category, even in the first world), there's experiment, and there's a dozen others. But my point was "there's things good people would do, and then there's things that they won't but bad people will. The latter category is likely to be all the fun-but-naughty stuff", and I think that's still basically true.
The next discussion thread is here.
This is a new thread to discuss Eliezer Yudkowsky’s Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality and anything related to it. This thread is intended for discussing chapter 84. The previous thread has passed 500 comments. Comment in the 14th thread until you read chapter 84.
There is now a site dedicated to the story at hpmor.com, which is now the place to go to find the authors notes and all sorts of other goodies. AdeleneDawner has kept an archive of Author’s Notes. (This goes up to the notes for chapter 76, and is now not updating. The authors notes from chapter 77 onwards are on hpmor.com.)
The first 5 discussion threads are on the main page under the harry_potter tag. Threads 6 and on (including this one) are in the discussion section using its separate tag system. Also: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14.
As a reminder, it’s often useful to start your comment by indicating which chapter you are commenting on.
Spoiler Warning: this thread is full of spoilers. With few exceptions, spoilers for MOR and canon are fair game to post, without warning or rot13. More specifically: