You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

JoshuaZ comments on Intelligence risk and distance to endgame - Less Wrong Discussion

-3 Post author: Kyre 13 April 2012 09:16AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (11)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 14 April 2012 03:31:03AM *  0 points [-]

To use a chess analogy: I'm virtually certain that Deep Blue will beat me at a game of chess. I'm also pretty sure that a better chess program with vastly more computer power would beat Deep Blu

This is not obvious to me. It isn't clear at what point increased intelligence start hitting severe diminishing marginal returns. Remember, chess is a finite game, and many games even between grandmasters with very different ratings result in draws.