You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

wedrifid comments on Our Phyg Is Not Exclusive Enough - Less Wrong Discussion

25 [deleted] 14 April 2012 09:08PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (513)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 14 April 2012 11:03:48PM *  4 points [-]

In fact, edit your post now please Nyan. Apart from that it's an excellent point. "Community", "website" or just about anything else.

"You're a ...." is already used as a fully general counterargument. Don't encourage it!

Comment author: [deleted] 14 April 2012 11:12:49PM 13 points [-]

I want to keep the use of the word, but to hide it from google I have replaced it with it's rot13: phyg

Comment author: Mitchell_Porter 15 April 2012 01:27:07AM 16 points [-]

And now we can all relax and have a truly uninhibited debate about whether LW is a phyg. Who would have guessed that rot13 has SEO applications?

Comment author: radical_negative_one 15 April 2012 06:46:43PM 2 points [-]

Just to be clear, we're all reading it as-is and pronouncing it like "fig", right? Because that's how i read it in my head.

Comment author: pedanterrific 15 April 2012 10:15:15PM 1 point [-]

I hope so, or this would make even less sense than it should.

Comment author: Alicorn 15 April 2012 08:05:22PM 1 point [-]

I've been pronouncing it to rhyme with the first syllable in "tiger".

Comment author: David_Gerard 15 April 2012 02:56:08PM -1 points [-]

The C-word is still there in the post URL!

Comment author: saturn 15 April 2012 07:04:40PM 9 points [-]
Comment author: David_Gerard 15 April 2012 08:15:22PM 2 points [-]

That's much better!

(I hadn't realised the post titles were redundant in Reddit code ...)

Comment author: [deleted] 14 April 2012 11:50:30PM 3 points [-]

Upvoted for agreeing and for reminding me to re-read a certain part of the sequences. I loath fully general counterarguments, especially that one.

That being said, would it be appropriate for you to edit your own comment to remove said word? I don't know (to any signifigant degree) how Google's search algorithms work, but I suspect that having that word in your comment also negatively affects the suggested searches.

Comment author: wedrifid 15 April 2012 12:03:00AM *  4 points [-]

That being said, would it be appropriate for you to edit your own comment to remove said word?

Oh, yeah, done.