You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

MagnetoHydroDynamics comments on More intuitive programming languages - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: A4FB53AC 15 April 2012 11:35AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (89)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: [deleted] 30 May 2012 04:35:38PM 0 points [-]

It seems that there are some who are incapable of learning programming. That said, when you are programming, you are virtually always working with a Von Neumann Architecture, so many languages have common ground.

Code is in general presented as composable units. Working in Symbolic Graphs of plaintext names or in actual graphs in 2d makes little difference.

If you really want to learn programming, but think that regular Java(script) or Python is trite and annoying, try Haskell. Haskell requires you to know math to actually make sense of anything, and it is very powerful in very different ways compared to Algol descendants.

Comment author: gwern 30 May 2012 04:45:45PM 1 point [-]

It seems that there are some who are incapable of learning programming.

Replication has proven difficult: http://www.gwern.net/Notes#the-camel-has-two-humps