The Born rule does not enter into the Everettian interpretation as the consequence of an additional dynamical process. Precisely how it enters is a matter of some controversy. I think the most promising program is the Savage-style decision theoretic approach adopted by the Oxford Everettians, which I discussed here. Whatever you think about the success of this approach, it is an attempt at a rigorous foundation for the Born rule that is missing from most other interpretations. I would also argue that it is a much simpler and more philosophically sound approach than postulating arbitrary discontinuities in physical law.
If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.